It links to a web page instead of linking to the home page of any site.
Due to the commercialization of the internet, deep linking has recently become slightly controversial. A prime advantage of the internet is the capacity to connect publicly available documents with each other.
Renowned organizations have filed various lawsuits against the validity of deep linking. It is mostly claimed by huge organizations that deep linking unreasonably hinders home pages from promoting brands and ad servers from functioning, thus opposing it.
Those who advocate for deep linking argue that it’s capacity to openly link bears significance in the working of publicly used internet. It is also contended that the deep link is preferable to the absence of any link for practical reasons. Deep-link may be more beneficial than a link to a home page, particularly if the targeted site has an inferior structure for navigation.
Helpful Article to Understand Deep Linking:
Deep Linking Takes Another Blow
Wired (July 25, 2002)
Net Lawyers Ponder the Right to Link
The Age (September 10, 2002)
NPR Retreats, Link Stink Lingers
Wired (June 28, 2002)
Deep Link Foes Get Another Win
Wired (July 8, 2002)
Public Protests NPR Link Policy
Wired (June 20, 2002)
Deep Linking is Good Linking
useit.com (March 3, 2002)
Big Stink Over a Simple Link
Wired (December 6, 2001)
Attention Editors: Deep Link Away
Wired (March 30, 2000)
ng’ Remains Deeply Complicated
NY Times (April 7, 2000)
Universal: Don’t Link to Us
Wired (July 27, 1999)
Was this article helpful?
Support us to keep up the good work and to provide you even better content. Your donations will be used to help students get access to quality content for free and pay our contributors’ salaries, who work hard to create this website content! Thank you for all your support!